Goal: To present a roadmap for sustainable energy use at the University of Notre Dame that addresses the following question: How might the future of energy generation at Norte Dame be impacted by changes and uncertainties related to production of natural gas and coal, regulatory landscapes, alternative energy sources, and Smart Grid technology?
Energy Consumption at Notre Dame
In general, energy consumption is determined in two ways: the type of energy inputs and the quantity of energy consumed. The Utilities Department at Notre Dame determines the exact fuel mix the University chooses to burn and the campus community determines the amount of energy that is consumed. From a business perspective, energy input decision-making is a product of complex strategy. As a business with budget constraints, pressure from high demand on campus, and pressing conservation and sustainability goals, the Utilities Department must make difficult choices that strike balances between sustainability initiatives and economic barriers.
Forces of Change
These outside forces of change and uncertainties in the energy industry are likely to impact the future roadmap for sustainability in energy generation at Notre Dame.
1. Hydraulic Fracturing – Changing Regulatory Landscape
Impact on Notre Dame: Heightened regulation and strict control over fracking procedures could raise the retail price of natural gas if drillers and operators are forced to adhere to costly modification to their process. On the one hand, this would be a detriment to Notre Dame’s operations because it might cause the University to revert back to using primarily coal. However, it could spur further investments in alternative energy out of necessity if natural gas becomes too costly.
2. International Natural Gas Demand – Natural Gas Globalization
Impact on Notre Dame: Over the past few years, Notre Dame has begun to heavily rely on natural gas in its energy generation mix. If the U.S. becomes a net exporter of natural gas several different outcomes could arise. Even without increased exports, the price of natural gas will rise in the long run as domestic reserves are depleted and supply shortens. Changes in domestic natural gas price levels would influence the University’s decision-making in choosing its fuel inputs for the future.
3. Carbon Constraints – The Future of Coal
Impact on Notre Dame: Since the University currently has access to significant reserves of cheap coal and infrastructure geared, in part, toward the use of coal for power generation, a breakthrough in carbon capture sequestration (CCS) technology would most likely be quite beneficial. Given the University’s 2030 Challenge and Long Range Plan for a more sustainable future, a clean and secure option for coal would provide significant advantages.
4. Alternative Energy
Impact on Notre Dame: The University currently generates a relatively small amount of energy from wind and solar sources. Because of the large amount of uncertainty surrounding these sources, however, Notre Dame has held back from major investments supporting the necessary infrastructure and capacity.
5. Smart Grid – Smart Consumption
Impact on Notre Dame: This technology revolution would most likely have huge impacts on the University. Since Notre Dame is a major consumer of energy, the “smart meter” component of smart grid technology would presumably revolutionize energy management at the University.
Benincasa, Armando. "The Current and Future State of Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation." Trends 42.3 (2011): n. pag. Science Direct. Web. 25 Mar. 2013. <http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/69686982/current-future-state-shale-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-regulation>.
Blohm, Andrew. "The Significance of Regulation and Land Use Patterns on Natural Gas Resource Estimates in the Marcellus Shale." Energy Policy 50 (2012): n. pag.Elsevier. Web.
Burtraw, Dallas. "US Status on Climate Change Mitigation." Discussion Paper 12.48 (2012): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. <http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-12-48.pdf>.
Burtraw, Dallas. "US Status on Climate Change Mitigation." Resources for the Future 12.48 (2012): n. pag. Resources for the Future. Oct. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2013.
Cathles, Lawrence. "The Natural Gas Debate Continues." Chemical Engineering Progress 108.8 (2012): n. pag. ProQuest. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.
Clastres, Cedric. "Smart Grids: Another Step towards Competition, Energy Security and Climate Change Objectives." Energy Policy 39.9 (2011): n. pag. Elsevier. Web.
Effect of Increased Natural Gas Exports on Domestic Energy Markets. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy, Jan. 2012. Web. 2013.
Foss, Michelle. "Global Natural Gas Issues and Challenges: A Commentary." The Energy Journal 26.2 (2005): n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 29 Mar. 2013.
Geman, Ben. "Obama Officials Delay ‘fracking’ Rules." The Hill: E2 Wire Energy Blog. The Hill, 18 Jan. 2013. Web.
Gold, Russel. "Gas Boom Projected to Grow for Decades." The Wall Street Journal. N.p., 27 Feb. 2013. Web. 25 Mar. 2013.
IEA. Technology Roadmap: Smart Grids. Publication. N.p.: International Energy Administration, n.d. Print.
International. International Energy Agency. Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2012 Fact Sheet. N.p.: n.p., 2012. Print.
Johnson, Jeff. "Methane: A New "Fracking" Fiasco." Chemical & Engineering News 90.16 (2012): 34-37. American Chemical Society. Web. 10 Mar. 2013.
Johnson, Keith. "Natural-Gas Export Fight Heats Up." Wall Street Journal (2013): n. pag. ProQuest. Web. 1 Apr. 2013.
Kempf, Paul. "Utilities Long Range Plan." Utilities Department of Notre Dame. Notre Dame, 2009. Web.
Krauss, Clifford. "Reversal of Fortune for U.S. Gas." The New York Times 5 Jan. 2013: n. pag. Print.
Marquez, Antonio. "Is Renewable Energy Effective in Promoting Growth?" Energy Policy 46 (n.d.): n. pag. Elsevier. Web.
Mohr, S.H. "Long Term Forecasting of Natural Gas Production." Energy Policy 39.9 (2011): n. pag. Elsevier. Web.
Naam, Ramez. "Smaller, Cheaper, Faster: Does Moore’s Law Apply to Solar Cells?" Web log post. Scientific American. N.p., 16 Mar. 2011. Web.
"Office of Sustainability // University of Notre Dame." Office of Sustainability // University of Notre Dame. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Apr. 2013.
Rubin, Edward, and Aaron Marks. "The Outlook for Improved Carbon Capture Technology." Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 38.5 (2012): n. pag. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.
Sawyer, Steve. "2010: GWEC Looks to 200 GW Mark." Renewable Energy Focus 11.5 (2010): n. pag. Elsevier. Web.
Solomon, Barry. "The Coming Sustainable Energy Transition: History, Strategies, and Outlook." Energy Policy 39.11 (2011): n. pag. Elsevier. Web.
Spence, David. "The Shale Gas Revolution Continues." Power (2013): n. pag. Access Intelligence LLC. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
"Topic: Wind Power." International Energy Agency. N.p., 2013. Web.
Tullo, Alexander. "Chemical and Gas Suppliers Battle Over LNG Exports." Chemical & Engineering News 91.10 (2013): n. pag. American Chemical Society. Web. 15 Mar. 2013.
University of Notre Dame. Notre Dame Utilities Department. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 2013. Print.